Portal:Digital Information Quality: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<div style="background-color:#FFCC66;border:solid 1px black;padding:8px 8px;margin-bottom: 20px"> | <div style="background-color:#FFCC66;border:solid 1px black;padding:8px 8px;margin-bottom: 20px"> | ||
==What is Information Quality?== | ==[[What is Digital Information Quality?]]== | ||
{{:What is Information Quality | {{:What is Digital Information Quality}} | ||
<p align=right>[[What is Digital Information Quality| '''Read More...''']]</p> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
<td style="vertical-align:top;padding-right:15px;width:50%"> | <td style="vertical-align:top;padding-right:15px;width:50%"> | ||
<div style="border:solid 1px black;padding: | <div style="border:solid 1px black;padding:10px 10px;margin-bottom: 20px"> | ||
==Problems?== | ==Problems?== | ||
{{:Problems of Digital Information Quality}} | {{:Problems of Digital Information Quality}} | ||
Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
= Narratives = | = Narratives = | ||
{{:Narratives - Digital Information Quality}} | {{:Narratives - Digital Information Quality}} | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:50% | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
*[[Narratives_-_Digital_Information_Quality#TVNewser | TVNewser]] | |||
*[[Narratives_-_Digital_Information_Quality#Dr._Google | Dr. Google]] | |||
| | |||
*[[Narratives_-_Digital_Information_Quality#Rewriting_History | Rewriting History]] | |||
*[[Narratives_-_Digital_Information_Quality#Divided_Opinions_on_Wikipedia | Divided Opinions on Wikipedia]] | |||
|} | |||
<p align=right> [[Narratives - Digital Information Quality| '''Read More...''']]</p> | <p align=right> [[Narratives - Digital Information Quality| '''Read More...''']]</p> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 11:24, 27 November 2007
What is Digital Information Quality?
- Information quality refers to information that is fit for its intended use. E.g. correct, complete, unbiased, and coherent information would be considered as high quality information.
- A general definition of the term âinformation qualityâ is not suitable as the quality of information depends on the respective circumstances and the affected individuals.
- A number of normative and descriptive criteria can constitute a general framework to evaluate the quality of information in particular contexts. Sample:
Problems?Does our conception of âthe more, the betterâ that is derived from an offline world still apply to the digitally connected world? This conception is based on the idea that people can take better decisions based on a set of diverse information sources among which they have a choice. However, in these days the lack of diverse information is not a threat anymore to most western societies. Information is no longer solely provided through a small number of hieratically and centralized structured media companies. Today, everybody has a voice in the internet and can contribute his thoughts to the online world. Thus, the problems in these days have shifted: SolutionsWe have come historically close to an important policy goal of our democratized information society. Thanks to the internet we have reached a state where information is created and accessed through multiple and diverse information sources. At the same time, this achievement raises new concerns in terms of quality issues. How can we ensure that users do not only have potential access to high quality information but can really harness and process such information? Addressing such concerns means taking measures on several layers. We are convinced that regulating information in its totality or setting uniform top-down quality standards are not appropriate ways to deal with information quality issues as it would endanger the openness and sustainability of the net. Information quality is complex. It requires consideration of different contexts, dimensions, and individual informational needs. Therefore, possible solutions should be reflected from various perspectives, including market, code, norm, and law perspectives. |
NarrativesThe rise of digital natives and their relationship to the internet raises questions with regard to digital information quality that are considerably distinct from quality conflicts in offline situations. Consider the following narratives for an illustration of such issues: |